A new study in the US has found that less than 8% of oncology clinical trials over the past decade featured participants from the country’s major races.

The study was performed by the University of British Columbia, the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, and Baylor University.

Discover B2B Marketing That Performs

Combine business intelligence and editorial excellence to reach engaged professionals across 36 leading media platforms.

Find out more

Data from cancer drug trials between 2008 and 2018, which comprised a total of 112,293 subjects across 230 studies, revealed a lack of racial and ethnic diversity.

Black and Hispanic patients were the most underrepresented at 22% and 44%, respectively, given the incidence of cancer in these populations.

Based on the study findings, researchers expressed concerns about the study drugs’ effectiveness in certain patients as therapeutic responses may be impacted by genetic differences.

University of British Columbia medical oncology assistant professor Dr Jonathan Loree said: “Our findings show that the science might not be applicable to the population that’s going to receive the medications.

GlobalData Strategic Intelligence

US Tariffs are shifting - will you react or anticipate?

Don’t let policy changes catch you off guard. Stay proactive with real-time data and expert analysis.

By GlobalData

“If patients are going to be receiving the drug, we need to know that it’s going to work for them with the same effectiveness that’s seen in the trial.”

During the study, the population-based cancer estimates by race in the US were calculated with the National Cancer Institute and US Census data.

Though the study was specific to the US, researchers noted that the findings are also applicable to Canada.

Commonly, drug makers seek approval in the US first because the country is known to cater to the largest market. Companies then make regulatory submissions to the European Medicines Agency and Health Canada.

Researchers noted that the trials reviewed in the approvals are typically the same. The team is currently analysing gender in the clinical trials and general population.

Clinical Trials Arena Excellence Awards - Nominations Closed

Nominations are now closed for the Clinical Trials Arena Excellence Awards. A big thanks to all the organisations that entered – your response has been outstanding, showcasing exceptional innovation, leadership, and impact

Excellence in Action
Science 37 has won the Research and Development Award in the Site Innovation category for its FDA inspected Direct-to-Patient Site model, delivering nationwide access, faster enrollment and higher retention. Explore how its virtual-first, in home approach is reshaping trial operations and accelerating time to data-driven decisions..

Discover the Impact